<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Parallax Header: How I Do It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cssquirrel.com/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/</link>
	<description>opinions and news on web design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 05:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32272</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-32272</guid>
		<description>Do you have a packaged version of this available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have a packaged version of this available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31536</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31536</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m working on a series of &quot;Javascript Feelings&quot; which attempt to explain complex human emotions using Javascript.  I&#039;ve used the parallax effect in my first piece entitled &quot;Intimacy With Strangers.&quot;

http://verytogether.com/lifestyle/play/javascript-feelings-intimacy-with-strangers.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m working on a series of &#8220;Javascript Feelings&#8221; which attempt to explain complex human emotions using Javascript.  I&#8217;ve used the parallax effect in my first piece entitled &#8220;Intimacy With Strangers.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://verytogether.com/lifestyle/play/javascript-feelings-intimacy-with-strangers.html" rel="nofollow">http://verytogether.com/lifestyle/play/javascript-feelings-intimacy-with-strangers.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31290</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31290</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the header moves the wrong way – I would think having the motion of the background oppose the mouse movement would seem more natural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the header moves the wrong way – I would think having the motion of the background oppose the mouse movement would seem more natural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VeoSotano</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31275</link>
		<dc:creator>VeoSotano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31275</guid>
		<description>@Kyle This brings up a question that I have since a long time ago... How many browsers which are CSS- and image-capable, but don&#039;t do JavaScript? I know users can manually disable JS in their browsers, but my guess is those are very rare... with so many pages out there that rely on it, no normal user would do that. I guess there are those who are security obsessed, but that raises another question - how insecure is JavaScript? Is there really any danger for your computer if you leave it on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kyle This brings up a question that I have since a long time ago&#8230; How many browsers which are CSS- and image-capable, but don&#8217;t do JavaScript? I know users can manually disable JS in their browsers, but my guess is those are very rare&#8230; with so many pages out there that rely on it, no normal user would do that. I guess there are those who are security obsessed, but that raises another question &#8211; how insecure is JavaScript? Is there really any danger for your computer if you leave it on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Weems</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31269</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Weems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31269</guid>
		<description>@VeoSotano - That&#039;s a valid solution. As Jack reminded us in the thread, though, divs have no semantic meaning. So even though they&#039;re excessive (in that they don&#039;t hold any content), they wouldn&#039;t qualify (to me) as non-semantic.

All that said, the reason I chose not to insert the divs via JavaScript is that I wanted the landscape to exist if JavaScript was disabled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@VeoSotano &#8211; That&#8217;s a valid solution. As Jack reminded us in the thread, though, divs have no semantic meaning. So even though they&#8217;re excessive (in that they don&#8217;t hold any content), they wouldn&#8217;t qualify (to me) as non-semantic.</p>
<p>All that said, the reason I chose not to insert the divs via JavaScript is that I wanted the landscape to exist if JavaScript was disabled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VeoSotano</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31267</link>
		<dc:creator>VeoSotano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31267</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say that, ideally, only semantic content should go in the HTML file. Why not create all those divs with jQuery?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that, ideally, only semantic content should go in the HTML file. Why not create all those divs with jQuery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parallax :: Thimbles &#38; Care</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31264</link>
		<dc:creator>Parallax :: Thimbles &#38; Care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31264</guid>
		<description>[...] CSSquirrel: The Parallax Header: How I Do It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CSSquirrel: The Parallax Header: How I Do It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mupet</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31255</link>
		<dc:creator>mupet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31255</guid>
		<description>wow, this amazing tricks, i like this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, this amazing tricks, i like this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Weems</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31250</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Weems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31250</guid>
		<description>@Michael - I know they&#039;re semantic get-out-of-jail-free cards. It doesn&#039;t mean that filling my header up with them feels right. Too hard wired, I think. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael &#8211; I know they&#8217;re semantic get-out-of-jail-free cards. It doesn&#8217;t mean that filling my header up with them feels right. Too hard wired, I think. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Zed</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31249</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Zed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31249</guid>
		<description>Div and span elements exist to group things &lt;em&gt;without&lt;/em&gt; implying semantics. This is exactly the right use for them if semantics is important. @Jack, the semantic Web doesn&#039;t require you to avoid things that are fun, non-textual, or just useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Div and span elements exist to group things <em>without</em> implying semantics. This is exactly the right use for them if semantics is important. @Jack, the semantic Web doesn&#8217;t require you to avoid things that are fun, non-textual, or just useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

