Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/cssquirrel/www.cssquirrel.com/blog/index.php:4) in /home/cssquirrel/www.cssquirrel.com/blog/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8 Comments on: The Parallax Header: How I Do It
http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/
opinions and news on web designMon, 12 Dec 2011 18:22:38 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1By: Jon
http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32272
JonWed, 19 Jan 2011 18:16:30 +0000http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-32272Do you have a packaged version of this available?Do you have a packaged version of this available?
]]>By: Tyler
http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31536
TylerSun, 21 Feb 2010 00:13:11 +0000http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31536I'm working on a series of "Javascript Feelings" which attempt to explain complex human emotions using Javascript. I've used the parallax effect in my first piece entitled "Intimacy With Strangers."
http://verytogether.com/lifestyle/play/javascript-feelings-intimacy-with-strangers.htmlI’m working on a series of “Javascript Feelings” which attempt to explain complex human emotions using Javascript. I’ve used the parallax effect in my first piece entitled “Intimacy With Strangers.”
]]>By: Paul
http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31290
PaulMon, 21 Dec 2009 14:11:29 +0000http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31290It seems to me that the header moves the wrong way – I would think having the motion of the background oppose the mouse movement would seem more natural.It seems to me that the header moves the wrong way – I would think having the motion of the background oppose the mouse movement would seem more natural.
]]>By: VeoSotano
http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31275
VeoSotanoSun, 13 Dec 2009 19:17:37 +0000http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31275@Kyle This brings up a question that I have since a long time ago... How many browsers which are CSS- and image-capable, but don't do JavaScript? I know users can manually disable JS in their browsers, but my guess is those are very rare... with so many pages out there that rely on it, no normal user would do that. I guess there are those who are security obsessed, but that raises another question - how insecure is JavaScript? Is there really any danger for your computer if you leave it on?@Kyle This brings up a question that I have since a long time ago… How many browsers which are CSS- and image-capable, but don’t do JavaScript? I know users can manually disable JS in their browsers, but my guess is those are very rare… with so many pages out there that rely on it, no normal user would do that. I guess there are those who are security obsessed, but that raises another question – how insecure is JavaScript? Is there really any danger for your computer if you leave it on?
]]>By: Kyle Weems
http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31269
Kyle WeemsThu, 10 Dec 2009 21:39:26 +0000http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31269@VeoSotano - That's a valid solution. As Jack reminded us in the thread, though, divs have no semantic meaning. So even though they're excessive (in that they don't hold any content), they wouldn't qualify (to me) as non-semantic.
All that said, the reason I chose not to insert the divs via JavaScript is that I wanted the landscape to exist if JavaScript was disabled.@VeoSotano – That’s a valid solution. As Jack reminded us in the thread, though, divs have no semantic meaning. So even though they’re excessive (in that they don’t hold any content), they wouldn’t qualify (to me) as non-semantic.
All that said, the reason I chose not to insert the divs via JavaScript is that I wanted the landscape to exist if JavaScript was disabled.
]]>By: VeoSotano
http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31267
VeoSotanoThu, 10 Dec 2009 20:43:02 +0000http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31267I'd say that, ideally, only semantic content should go in the HTML file. Why not create all those divs with jQuery?I’d say that, ideally, only semantic content should go in the HTML file. Why not create all those divs with jQuery?
]]>By: Parallax :: Thimbles & Care
http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31264
Parallax :: Thimbles & CareWed, 09 Dec 2009 18:45:52 +0000http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31264[...] CSSquirrel: The Parallax Header: How I Do It [...][...] CSSquirrel: The Parallax Header: How I Do It [...]
]]>By: mupet
http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31255
mupetTue, 08 Dec 2009 11:50:49 +0000http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31255wow, this amazing tricks, i like thiswow, this amazing tricks, i like this
]]>By: Kyle Weems
http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31250
Kyle WeemsSun, 06 Dec 2009 18:41:17 +0000http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31250@Michael - I know they're semantic get-out-of-jail-free cards. It doesn't mean that filling my header up with them feels right. Too hard wired, I think. ;)@Michael – I know they’re semantic get-out-of-jail-free cards. It doesn’t mean that filling my header up with them feels right. Too hard wired, I think. ;)
]]>By: Michael Zed
http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/04/the-parallax-header-how-i-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-31249
Michael ZedSun, 06 Dec 2009 17:37:13 +0000http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=515#comment-31249Div and span elements exist to group things <em>without</em> implying semantics. This is exactly the right use for them if semantics is important. @Jack, the semantic Web doesn't require you to avoid things that are fun, non-textual, or just useless.Div and span elements exist to group things without implying semantics. This is exactly the right use for them if semantics is important. @Jack, the semantic Web doesn’t require you to avoid things that are fun, non-textual, or just useless.
]]>