<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Annoyed by Opacity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/06/20/annoyed-by-opacity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/06/20/annoyed-by-opacity/</link>
	<description>opinions and news on web design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 05:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/06/20/annoyed-by-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=38#comment-129</guid>
		<description>That does make sense. I guess I just wish that all the modern browsers were already using the scalpel (RGBa), and not just the blunt hammer of opacity... although come to think of it, IE doesn&#039;t even have the hammer.

Here&#039;s hoping IE8 is improved in that regard. Not that I&#039;m holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That does make sense. I guess I just wish that all the modern browsers were already using the scalpel (RGBa), and not just the blunt hammer of opacity&#8230; although come to think of it, IE doesn&#8217;t even have the hammer.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping IE8 is improved in that regard. Not that I&#8217;m holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Meyer</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/06/20/annoyed-by-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=38#comment-104</guid>
		<description>&#039;opacity&#039; operates exactly the same way &#039;visibility&#039; does in this regard, and was more or less specced to act as a form of variable visibility.  If you set a paragraph to be hidden, you can&#039;t make its links visible.  Similarly, if you make a paragraph half-opaque, you can&#039;t make its links more opaque than that.  Although you should be able to make them less opaque, come to think of it.  As in, set the paragraph to be half-opaque and the links to be half-opaque: that should make the links less opaque than just setting the paragraph half-opaque.

But anyway, think of it as variable visibility and you&#039;re set.  RGBa operates a different way, in part to make it more powerful and flexible than &#039;opacity&#039;, which is kind of a blunt instrument (just like &#039;visibility&#039;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;opacity&#8217; operates exactly the same way &#8216;visibility&#8217; does in this regard, and was more or less specced to act as a form of variable visibility.  If you set a paragraph to be hidden, you can&#8217;t make its links visible.  Similarly, if you make a paragraph half-opaque, you can&#8217;t make its links more opaque than that.  Although you should be able to make them less opaque, come to think of it.  As in, set the paragraph to be half-opaque and the links to be half-opaque: that should make the links less opaque than just setting the paragraph half-opaque.</p>
<p>But anyway, think of it as variable visibility and you&#8217;re set.  RGBa operates a different way, in part to make it more powerful and flexible than &#8216;opacity&#8217;, which is kind of a blunt instrument (just like &#8216;visibility&#8217;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

