<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elsewhere: William Flake&#8217;s &#8220;Of Squirrels and Men&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/08/elsewhere-michael-flakes-of-squirrels-and-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/08/elsewhere-michael-flakes-of-squirrels-and-men/</link>
	<description>opinions and news on web design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 05:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Weems</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/08/elsewhere-michael-flakes-of-squirrels-and-men/comment-page-1/#comment-31285</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Weems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=541#comment-31285</guid>
		<description>@Michael - Re: the CAPTCHA. The new version uses a single image, but ups the challenge by requiring the user to recognize the image and match it with the proper word to write in the box (rather than clicking on a given box, which even a robot can get right 33% of the time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael &#8211; Re: the CAPTCHA. The new version uses a single image, but ups the challenge by requiring the user to recognize the image and match it with the proper word to write in the box (rather than clicking on a given box, which even a robot can get right 33% of the time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/08/elsewhere-michael-flakes-of-squirrels-and-men/comment-page-1/#comment-31282</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=541#comment-31282</guid>
		<description>@William - well not quite equally well. It doesn&#039;t work on my browser : Opera. &quot;mouseenter&quot; is only in the draft state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@William &#8211; well not quite equally well. It doesn&#8217;t work on my browser : Opera. &#8220;mouseenter&#8221; is only in the draft state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kozakewich</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/08/elsewhere-michael-flakes-of-squirrels-and-men/comment-page-1/#comment-31281</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kozakewich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=541#comment-31281</guid>
		<description>Oh, beautiful! There was a pervading feeling in the old version that one was limited to looking through a window -- I could go one way or another to see a slightly different view, but that was all.
Now I can scroll forever. That jump was horrid.

(Also, you said a little while ago that your captcha is broken. Is it &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; showing the robot? That&#039;s all I&#039;ve seen, lately.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, beautiful! There was a pervading feeling in the old version that one was limited to looking through a window &#8212; I could go one way or another to see a slightly different view, but that was all.<br />
Now I can scroll forever. That jump was horrid.</p>
<p>(Also, you said a little while ago that your captcha is broken. Is it <em>always</em> showing the robot? That&#8217;s all I&#8217;ve seen, lately.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Flake</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/08/elsewhere-michael-flakes-of-squirrels-and-men/comment-page-1/#comment-31265</link>
		<dc:creator>William Flake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=541#comment-31265</guid>
		<description>@David - Actually, no reason at all.  I&#039;ve not had much experience with client-side scripting, and &#039;mouseenter&#039; was the result of my searching for a property that allowed me to record the position of mouse entry.  After some brief testing, it looks like &#039;mouseover&#039; works equally well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David &#8211; Actually, no reason at all.  I&#8217;ve not had much experience with client-side scripting, and &#8216;mouseenter&#8217; was the result of my searching for a property that allowed me to record the position of mouse entry.  After some brief testing, it looks like &#8216;mouseover&#8217; works equally well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/08/elsewhere-michael-flakes-of-squirrels-and-men/comment-page-1/#comment-31263</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=541#comment-31263</guid>
		<description>Is there a reason why to use the working draft &#039;mouseenter&#039; instead of the recommended &#039;mouseover&#039; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a reason why to use the working draft &#8216;mouseenter&#8217; instead of the recommended &#8216;mouseover&#8217; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schiller</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/08/elsewhere-michael-flakes-of-squirrels-and-men/comment-page-1/#comment-31261</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=541#comment-31261</guid>
		<description>Nice - I always hated your header for the very reason of the &#039;jump&#039;.  Much nicer now! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice &#8211; I always hated your header for the very reason of the &#8216;jump&#8217;.  Much nicer now! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woodland</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2009/12/08/elsewhere-michael-flakes-of-squirrels-and-men/comment-page-1/#comment-31260</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Woodland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=541#comment-31260</guid>
		<description>Very nice work, Mr Flake.  At first, I didn&#039;t see any difference, but after I cleared my cache, it worked flawlessly.  As I moved my cursor from left to right, just below the trees, I also moved it up into the trees and back out several times.  No jerks allowed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice work, Mr Flake.  At first, I didn&#8217;t see any difference, but after I cleared my cache, it worked flawlessly.  As I moved my cursor from left to right, just below the trees, I also moved it up into the trees and back out several times.  No jerks allowed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

