<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic Update: Veritas Sciurus &#8211; Must Web Designers Code?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2010/03/01/comic-update-veritas-sciurus-must-web-designers-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2010/03/01/comic-update-veritas-sciurus-must-web-designers-code/</link>
	<description>opinions and news on web design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 05:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint Podcast #51: Real Web Designers Get It &#124; PHP Podcasts</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2010/03/01/comic-update-veritas-sciurus-must-web-designers-code/comment-page-1/#comment-31959</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint Podcast #51: Real Web Designers Get It &#124; PHP Podcasts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=632#comment-31959</guid>
		<description>[...] created a bit of a storm of controversy, and CSSquirrel, another friend of the show, has a great sort of summary of all the opinions that were put forward in response to this. We’ll link to that post in the show notes. But, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] created a bit of a storm of controversy, and CSSquirrel, another friend of the show, has a great sort of summary of all the opinions that were put forward in response to this. We’ll link to that post in the show notes. But, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint Podcast #51: Real Web Designers Get It</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2010/03/01/comic-update-veritas-sciurus-must-web-designers-code/comment-page-1/#comment-31886</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint Podcast #51: Real Web Designers Get It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=632#comment-31886</guid>
		<description>[...] created a bit of a storm of controversy, and CSSquirrel, another friend of the show, has a great sort of summary of all the opinions that were put forward in response to this. We’ll link to that post in the show notes. But, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] created a bit of a storm of controversy, and CSSquirrel, another friend of the show, has a great sort of summary of all the opinions that were put forward in response to this. We’ll link to that post in the show notes. But, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennie</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2010/03/01/comic-update-veritas-sciurus-must-web-designers-code/comment-page-1/#comment-31885</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=632#comment-31885</guid>
		<description>None of your comics are working at the moment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of your comics are working at the moment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krzysztof Maczyński</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2010/03/01/comic-update-veritas-sciurus-must-web-designers-code/comment-page-1/#comment-31884</link>
		<dc:creator>Krzysztof Maczyński</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=632#comment-31884</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no comic at http://www.cssquirrel.com/comic/?comic=55. It says “big error”.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no comic at <a href="http://www.cssquirrel.com/comic/?comic=55" rel="nofollow">http://www.cssquirrel.com/comic/?comic=55</a>. It says “big error”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jin</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2010/03/01/comic-update-veritas-sciurus-must-web-designers-code/comment-page-1/#comment-31882</link>
		<dc:creator>Jin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=632#comment-31882</guid>
		<description>Kyle, you know where I stand on this issue. I feel like much has been said over the years, repeatedly about the benefits of a web designers being able to code html/css. I remember your post a while back generated a lot interesting discussions. http://www.cssquirrel.com/2009/10/14/designers-and-code/

Instead of filling up your comment section, here are a few points of my own: http://www.8164.org/web-designers-coding/

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle, you know where I stand on this issue. I feel like much has been said over the years, repeatedly about the benefits of a web designers being able to code html/css. I remember your post a while back generated a lot interesting discussions. <a href="http://www.cssquirrel.com/2009/10/14/designers-and-code/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cssquirrel.com/2009/10/14/designers-and-code/</a></p>
<p>Instead of filling up your comment section, here are a few points of my own: <a href="http://www.8164.org/web-designers-coding/" rel="nofollow">http://www.8164.org/web-designers-coding/</a></p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kozakewich</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2010/03/01/comic-update-veritas-sciurus-must-web-designers-code/comment-page-1/#comment-31880</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kozakewich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=632#comment-31880</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d put an &quot;EARLIER...&quot; on the third panel, to avoid confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d put an &#8220;EARLIER&#8230;&#8221; on the third panel, to avoid confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanJA</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2010/03/01/comic-update-veritas-sciurus-must-web-designers-code/comment-page-1/#comment-31879</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanJA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=632#comment-31879</guid>
		<description>If the &#039;designer&#039; cannot code, he has no place destroying my markup/code that I worked so painstakingly on to make it easy to finish the final product because _he_ thinks it looks _better_ @%$#@$%@#. As a designer who cannot code (or understand the semantic meaning of html tags apparently... h1 != fieldset &gt; legend) just don&#039;t, it will cause way more headaches in the future for everyone else when you do.

/rant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the &#8216;designer&#8217; cannot code, he has no place destroying my markup/code that I worked so painstakingly on to make it easy to finish the final product because _he_ thinks it looks _better_ @%$#@$%@#. As a designer who cannot code (or understand the semantic meaning of html tags apparently&#8230; h1 != fieldset &gt; legend) just don&#8217;t, it will cause way more headaches in the future for everyone else when you do.</p>
<p>/rant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Schrab</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2010/03/01/comic-update-veritas-sciurus-must-web-designers-code/comment-page-1/#comment-31878</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Schrab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=632#comment-31878</guid>
		<description>@Jeff Edsell - Referencing &quot;Understanding Comics&quot; as it applies to web development?  Instant credibility, IMHO!  Your point about the analogy of &quot;artist and writers working together to make comics&quot; to &quot;graphic designers and coders, ahem, &#039;markup-ers&#039; working together to make websites&quot; I think is spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeff Edsell &#8211; Referencing &#8220;Understanding Comics&#8221; as it applies to web development?  Instant credibility, IMHO!  Your point about the analogy of &#8220;artist and writers working together to make comics&#8221; to &#8220;graphic designers and coders, ahem, &#8216;markup-ers&#8217; working together to make websites&#8221; I think is spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Hansen</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2010/03/01/comic-update-veritas-sciurus-must-web-designers-code/comment-page-1/#comment-31877</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=632#comment-31877</guid>
		<description>Of course designers should understand coding. Does that mean they need to code each design themselves, no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course designers should understand coding. Does that mean they need to code each design themselves, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Jack</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2010/03/01/comic-update-veritas-sciurus-must-web-designers-code/comment-page-1/#comment-31876</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=632#comment-31876</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s one of my bugbears, but I think the use of the word &#039;code&#039; in this context also puts a lot of designers off. HTML certainly shouldn&#039;t be thought of as &#039;coding&#039;, as much as &#039;marking up&#039;; it&#039;s very analogous to using punctuation. CSS, whilst much more complicated than HTML, isn&#039;t really coding either. And some of the tricky layout-related concepts are actually pretty easily understood by most designers, in my experience.

(Embarrassed to say I just got the captcha wrong. I now feel non-sentient :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one of my bugbears, but I think the use of the word &#8216;code&#8217; in this context also puts a lot of designers off. HTML certainly shouldn&#8217;t be thought of as &#8216;coding&#8217;, as much as &#8216;marking up&#8217;; it&#8217;s very analogous to using punctuation. CSS, whilst much more complicated than HTML, isn&#8217;t really coding either. And some of the tricky layout-related concepts are actually pretty easily understood by most designers, in my experience.</p>
<p>(Embarrassed to say I just got the captcha wrong. I now feel non-sentient :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

