<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CSSquirrel &#187; cssquirrel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cssquirrel.com/tag/cssquirrel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog</link>
	<description>opinions and news on web design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Squirrel Upgrade</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/10/21/squirrel-upgrade/</link>
		<comments>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/10/21/squirrel-upgrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Weems</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cssquirrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s trendy to brand a site redesign as 2.0 (or 3.0, 4.0, etc.), so much so that I don&#8217;t think I want to go down that path. But as of Monday, October 20, 2008, CSSquirrel is operating under a new redesign. A major annoyance I had with the previous incarnation of the site was that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s trendy to brand a site redesign as 2.0 (or 3.0, 4.0, etc.), so much so that I don&#8217;t think I want to go down that path. But as of Monday, October 20, 2008, CSSquirrel is operating under a new redesign.</p>
<p>A major annoyance I had with the previous incarnation of the site was that it looked entirely too much like a WordPress-powered blog.</p>
<p>And yes, it is one. But it&#8217;s more than that. It&#8217;s become a sort of rallying point for my identity on the massive nest of tubes called the Internet, and I needed it to reflect more than a weekly blog entry about obscure CSS styles. As I&#8217;ve been absorbed into more and more social pieces of Web 2.0 (see, even the web can&#8217;t avoid that numbering system), I found myself having more and more of a challenge of directing people to various bits of me on the Internet.</p>
<p><span id="more-124"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Go here for my photos. Go here for my Twitter, I update that a lot. Go here for my blog, I updated that a bit less. Ooh, I&#8217;ve got a comic over here, <em>ad nauseum</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, no longer. I&#8217;ve redesigned the site so that the home page operates as central hub for it all. From my massive collection of pictures of my cats to my recent tweets to Mindfly&#8217;s official blog, they&#8217;re all linked through here. And good riddance. I can cut a few domain names off my e-mail signatures and stationary.</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s brighter. Although I may adjust the level later based on feedback, it became apparent to me that my old design was a bit too drab in coloration. Not quite somber like a funeral, but more like the cover of a really exciting book about statistics.</p>
<p>Lastly, it incorporates my recent obsession with vector graphics and my continuing experimentation with JavaScript animations. I rather enjoy the header&#8217;s parallax scrolling (this doesn&#8217;t happen in IE due to that browser&#8217;s woefully slow JS engine), and other tiny bits are sprinkled about like digital pixie dust.</p>
<p>I almost wanted to shorten that to &#8220;dixie dust&#8221;, but that gave entirely the wrong impression.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m imagining what Confederate fairies are like&#8230;</p>
<p>Ok, back on topic. There&#8217;s a few kinks to be worked out, such as restraining sub-pages with a maximum width, building a contact form (oh how I loathe contact forms) and discovering a few hidden niches of my site that I&#8217;ve forgotten about, but I&#8217;m pretty pleased with the results thus far. So here it is: brighter, animated, and socially condensed. If you&#8217;ve got any feedback, good or bad, I&#8217;d like to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/10/21/squirrel-upgrade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vector CSSquirrel Doodle</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/08/22/vector-cssquirrel-doodle/</link>
		<comments>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/08/22/vector-cssquirrel-doodle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Weems</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cssquirrel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In preparation for making my first attempt at a 100% vector graphics CSSquirrel comic, here&#8217;s a vector image test of the squirrel himself: I may have to put an outline around the guy, I guess it depends on how an assembled comic looks without outlines. It&#8217;s a different style, not nessecarily a bad one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In preparation for making my first attempt at a 100% vector graphics CSSquirrel comic, here&#8217;s a vector image test of the squirrel himself:<br />
<img class="aligncenter" title="Vector CSSquirrel" src="/images/vector_squirrel.png" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></p>
<p>I may have to put an outline around the guy, I guess it depends on how an assembled comic looks without outlines. It&#8217;s a different style, not nessecarily a bad one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/08/22/vector-cssquirrel-doodle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work In Progress</title>
		<link>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/04/22/work-in-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/04/22/work-in-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Weems</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cssquirrel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not done, but the new site design is in the process of going up. I know that saying something is a &#8220;work in progress&#8221; on the web-o-tron is a bit silly of a statement. It is a dynamic media, after all. It is safe to say, however, that the design isn&#8217;t quite where I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not done, but the new site design is in the process of going up. I know that saying something is a &#8220;work in progress&#8221; on the web-o-tron is a bit silly of a statement. It is a dynamic media, after all. It is safe to say, however, that the design isn&#8217;t quite where I plan for it to be. There should be a cartoon squirrel involved at some point, as well as a number of refinements to margins, fonts, spacing, etc.</p>
<p>Whee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cssquirrel.com/blog/2008/04/22/work-in-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

